论文部分内容阅读
很多不同的运动方案在临床心脏病学中应用。因为没有单一的试验适用于广泛的病人运动容量,所以很多地方采取两种方案,一种是健康状况较好的病人,另一种是较受限制的病人。本研究的目的是没计一种适应所有病人运动容量并能应用于平板车或脚踏功率车的方案。病人与方法:30例健康男性自愿者(平均年龄38岁,28～55岁;平均体重74公斤,57～97公斤)进行新运动试验与标准方案的对比。新方案设计是以低工作负荷(2MET,7ml/kg/min)开始,最初增量是以每分钟增加前级的15%负荷小量地进行维持。这种方法产生工作负荷指数性增加,需要试验相对健康的病人最高分级在15分钟后达到。这
Many different exercise programs are used in clinical cardiology. Because there is no single test for a wide range of patients’ exercise capacity, two options are available in many locations, one in better-health patients and the other in more restricted patients. The purpose of this study was to find a solution that accommodates all patients’ exercise capacity and can be applied to a flatbed or foot powered vehicle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy male volunteers (mean age 38 years, 28-55 years; mean body weight 74 kg, 57-97 kg) were enrolled in a new exercise trial compared to the standard regimen. The new design was started with a low workload (2 MET, 7 ml / kg / min) and the initial increment was maintained at a small 15% load increase per minute. This approach results in an exponential increase in workload, which is reached after 15 minutes for patients who need to test relatively healthy patients. This