论文部分内容阅读
最近,抚顺学区公布了几名同学考试违纪作“假”的事例,以校令方式让作“假”者曝光,并给作“假”者以处分的举措,我认为好得很。一是好在严肃了纪律,净化了考场环境。动了“真格”的,让再想作“假”者望而怯步;二是好在维护了大多数同学的利益。否定作“假”者,就是对守纪学员的鼓励和赞扬。考试作“假”者都有一些理由:一曰工作多,时间少,来不及准备考试;二曰年龄大,记忆差;三曰你抄,他抄,我不抄就是吃亏;
Recently, Fushun School District released a few students examining disciplinary violations as “false” cases, with the order of the school as “false” who exposed, and to give “false” to take measures to punish, I think very good. One is good at serious discipline, purifying the examination room environment. Moved “real ”, so think again as “false ” who hope and dreadful; Second, good to maintain the interests of most students. Negation as “false ” who is to encourage discipline and discipline students praise. There are some reasons for the exam to be “False”: one says more work and less time is too late to prepare for the exam; the second is older and the memory is poor; the third one is that you copy and that he copy;