论文部分内容阅读
“编辑学者化”是一个激动人心的口号,任何有上进心的编辑工作者都不会对它无动于衷。对个体来说,一个人既能够是称职的游刃有余的编辑,又能够是知名的出类拔萃的学者,两副重担一肩挑,且都能挑出名堂,这无疑是值得骄傲的人生。对社会来说,如果每一位编辑工作者都能成为鲁迅、邹韬奋那样的精英人物,那将是民族的幸事、国家的幸事。因此,一个时期以来,广大编辑工作者对这个口号由关注而思考,由思考而讨论,各报刊也陆续发表了许多有关文章。然而观点并不一致。有的认为编辑必须学者化,不学者化就没有资格当编辑,有的认为编辑应该学者化,不然就不能提高编辑水平;有的认为只有学术编辑才应该学者化,一般编辑则可不必;有的认为编辑应另辟学者蹊径,还有的认为编辑重要的是“编辑化”而不是“学者化”……种种议论,各有各的视角、各有各的依据,至今仍在争论、莫衷一是,且看不出短期内能够统一认识的迹象。
Editing Scholarly is an exciting slogan that no motivated editorial worker will be indifferent to. It is undoubtedly a matter of pride for an individual to be capable of being a well-qualified and competent editors, a well-known and outstanding scholar, with both shoulders and shoulders, and capable of singling out names. To the community, if every editor can become such an elite as Lu Xun and Zou Tao-fen, it will be the blessing of the nation and the blessing of the country. Therefore, a large number of editorial workers have been thinking about this slogan from a time of thinking and discussed by thinking, and various newspapers have published many relevant articles successively. However, the views are not consistent. Some believe editors must be scholarly, not scholarly editors are not qualified, others think editors should be scholarly, otherwise they can not raise the editorial level; some think that only scholarly editors should be scholarly; editors may not; there are Think editors should set off scholarly paths, and others think editors are important instead of scholarly editors ... All kinds of arguments, each having its own point of view and its own basis, are still controversial and incomprehensible , And can not see any sign of unification in the short term.