论文部分内容阅读
任何一项科研成果完成以后,都需要对其技术水平、经济效益、社会价值进行综合性的评价和鉴定。以前,鉴定的依据不外乎两方面:1.与现行的国际、国内标准比较,项目人员自己提供的经济效益核算表,用户意见;2.召开鉴定会,由专家、权威和有关人士作出评定意见。这种鉴定方法一直存在着以下弊端:结论意见缺乏客观性、严密性,特别是对技术水平的评价带有“经验评价”的性质,容易渗杂个人意志甚至流于形式。为了克服长期以来科研成果鉴定方法上的不足,越来越多地引入了查新手段。
After the completion of any scientific research, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and appraisal of its technical level, economic benefits and social values. Previously, the basis of identification no more than two aspects: 1. Compared with the current international and domestic standards, project personnel to provide their own economic benefits accounting tables, user comments; 2. Convening appraisal will be experts, authorities and stakeholders to make assessments opinion. This appraisal method has the following disadvantages all the time: The conclusion opinion is lack of objectivity and rigor, especially the evaluation of the technical level is of the nature of “experience evaluation”, and it is easy to infiltrate the individual will and even the formality. In order to overcome the shortcomings in the identification of scientific research achievements over a long period of time, more and more new means have been introduced.