论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨在临床诊断宫颈病变中应用宫颈管内膜刮取术的价值。方法:选取我院就诊的148例女性患者进行回顾性研究分析,所有患者均施行宫颈管内膜刮取术联合阴道镜下多点活检和宫颈冷刀锥切术,然后对两种方法的检出结果进行比较。结果:宫颈管内膜刮取术联合阴道镜下多点活检和宫颈冷刀锥切术两种检查结果的检出率均较高,且吻合度较高,两种方法检出结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:宫颈管内膜刮取术联合阴道镜下多点活检和宫颈冷刀锥切术结果具有良好的一致性,能够较好的反应宫颈病变情况,准确率高,宫颈管内膜刮取术具有能有效提高检出率和准确率,安全可靠,值得在临床上进一步应用和研究。
Objective: To investigate the value of cervical endometrial scraping in the clinical diagnosis of cervical lesions. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 148 female patients treated in our hospital. All patients underwent endocervical curettage combined with colposcopy multi-point biopsy and cervical cold knife conization, and then examined the two methods The results are compared. Results: The detection rate of cervical endometrial scraping combined with colposcopy multi-point biopsy and cervical cold knife conization were higher, and the coincidence was higher, the two methods showed no significant results Difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Cervical endometrial scraping combined colposcopy multipoint biopsy and cervical cold knife conization results have good consistency, can better respond to cervical lesions, high accuracy, cervical endometrial scraping With can effectively improve the detection rate and accuracy, safe and reliable, it is worth further clinical application and research.