在对走不同体制变革道路的经济进行国别比较时,应该充分注意它们所面临的不同历史条件。一个经济在某一时点上选择激进道路,不是因为其喜欢,而因为“不得不”了 从表面上看来,中俄两国体制变革的一个最大不同是改革对社会和民众的震荡,中国经济持续增长,社会矛盾较小,而俄罗斯经济持续下跌,公众怨言、民族矛盾、黑社会等总问题严重,杜会矛盾较大。虽然从长远来看,并不能断定,中国的渐进改革一定比俄罗斯激进改革更成功,但无可否认,一个稳定的社会是很重 When comparing the economies of countries that take different paths of institutional change, they should pay due attention to the different historical conditions that they face. An economy chooses the radical road at some point not because it likes it but because it “has to.” On the surface, one of the biggest differences between China and Russia in the structural reform is the turmoil in the society and people in the reform. The Chinese economy Sustained growth and less social conflicts. The Russian economy continued to fall. Public complaints, ethnic conflicts and triad problems were all serious problems. There was a great deal of conflict between the two sides. Although in the long run it can not be concluded that China’s gradual reform will certainly be more successful than the radical reforms in Russia, it is undeniable that a stable society is very heavy