在中国历史上，把受宗教迷信影响的起事和暴动，往往称之为“妖贼”、“妖人”或“妖道”，这类事件不绝于书，吴承伯起义只是其中影响很小的一次，但它却被误认为受火祆教影响的一次起义。本文考察了魏晋南北朝隋唐时期与吴承伯起义相仿的几次暴动，以及火祆教来华的流播状况，认为吴承伯所挟之“道”，不能当作“祆道”，即波斯火教解，而应通“妖”，作“妖道”解；并认为吴承伯起义受到民间道教的影响 In Chinese history, incidents and riots affected by religious superstitions are often referred to as the “demon thief,” “monster,” or “monsterism.” These incidents are not without a book. The Wu Chengbo uprising is only a small one Once, however, it was mistakenly thought to have been an uprising affected by Ecclesiasis. This paper examines several riots similar to the Wu Chengbo Uprising in the Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties and Sui and Tang dynasties and the spread of fire to teach in China. They think that the “Taoism” that Wu Chengbo threatened can not be regarded as “Taoism” , But should pass “demon”, as “demon” solution; and that the Uprising of Wu Chengbo by folk Taoism