论文部分内容阅读
《关于限制被执行人高消费的若干规定》的推广实施过程中,不可避免的损害到被执行人的声誉。在执行案件中,被执行人所肩负的负担行为主要是针对责任财产标的,但是《限制高消费的规定》的实施,使得被执行人除在责任财产受到应有的损失外,其自身人格权也受到损害。这样的结果明显有违市民社会的平等价值观。被执行人一旦被处以《限制高消费的规定》,其社会名誉的毁损度具有不可扭转性。相比较被执行人的个人利益,《限制高消费的规定》所维护的债权人的信赖利益和社会交易安全更具有合理性。将天平的砝码向社会多数群体倾斜,这是立法者所追求的价值核心,也是法律适用过程中法律正义与社会正义磨合发展的必经之路。
The promotion and implementation of “Several Provisions on Limiting the High Consumption by the Enforced Persons” inevitably undermine the reputation of the executed party. In executing cases, the burden on the executors mainly targets the responsible property, but the implementation of the “Provisions on the restriction of high consumption” makes it possible for the enforced persons, apart from the due loss of the responsible property, Also damaged. Such a result obviously violates the civil society’s equal values. Once the enforced person is placed “a provision restricting high consumption,” the damage caused by his social reputation is irreversible. Compared with the personal interest of the executor, the trust benefits of creditors and the social transaction security maintained by the “Provisions restricting high consumption” are more reasonable. It is the value core that lawmakers pursue and also the only way that legal justice and social justice run in the process of legal application.