《刑法》第296条规定了转化型抢劫,而在这个条文出来之后最高人民法院先后颁布了两个司法解释,其中《关于审理抢劫、抢夺刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》倾向于先行行为无需构成盗窃、诈骗或者抢夺罪也能够转化为抢劫罪,旨在把这类行为向认定为抢劫罪靠拢。然而,在最高院2006年颁布了《审理未成年人刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》,据此在行为人的年龄在已满14周岁未满16周岁区间时却不能构成转化型抢劫,意味着行为人的先行行为必须构成犯罪才能转化为抢劫罪。该解释违背了刑法原则,与学界通说以及最高院的《意见》体现的价值取向相抵触,体现了两种不同的价值倾向,建议在今后予以废除。 Article 296 of the Criminal Law provides for transformational robbery, and after this provision came out, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated two judicial interpretations. Among them, the “Opinion on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Robbery and Robbing Criminal Cases” Crimes that constitute theft, fraud or robbery can also be converted into robberies aimed at bringing such acts closer to being identified as robberies. However, in 2006, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the “Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Juvenile Delinquency Cases”, whereby the perpetrator’s age can not constitute a transformational robbery when it is under the age of 14 and under the age of 16, Means that the perpetrator’s prior behavior must constitute a crime can be converted into robbery. This interpretation runs counter to the principle of criminal law, contradicts the scholarly account and the value orientation embodied in the Supreme Court’s Opinion, embodies two different values ​​and proposes to be abolished in the future.