论文部分内容阅读
大体上言,有关上海苏报案的报道、著述颇丰,但严谨的学术成果并不多,其中法学类作品也很少见,而有分量的杰出研究更是屈指可数。蔡斐先生的博士学位论文《1903年:上海苏报案与清末司法转型》(下称蔡文)正是一部难得的代表性作品。①基于对上海苏报案的完整拼结与细致描述,蔡文揭示了中国固有司法与西洋舶来司法之间的张力,探究了清末司法转型具有的某种必然性,还进一步阐释并践行了“小叙事、大视野”研究路径。蔡斐博士对苏报案的关注及研究可以溯及至其攻读新闻学硕士学位期间,②故而可言,蔡文绝
Generally speaking, the report on the Shanghai Soviet report, published quite abundant, but not many rigorous academic achievements, including legal works are rare, but the amount of outstanding research is even more. Mr. Cai Fei’s doctoral dissertation “1903: Report on Shanghai Soviet Union and Judicial Transformation in the Late Qing Dynasty” (hereinafter referred to as Cai Wen) is a rare representative work. Based on the complete combination and detailed description of the report of Shanghai Soviet Union, Cai Wen revealed the tension between the inherent law of China and the justice of the Western Seas, explored some inevitability of judiciary transformation in the late Qing Dynasty, further explained and practiced “ Small narrative, big vision ”research path. Dr. Cai Fei’s attention and research on the Soviet report can be traced back to the period of his master’s degree in journalism. Therefore, Cai Wenjian