论文部分内容阅读
我们又回到老问题上来了,一百年前的时髦论题就是国家的权限问题。今天我们也在不知不觉地进行着一场一个世纪以前轰动法学界和政治界的辩论,主题仍是政府的权限问题。在这场辩论中,就如在美国政界的所有重大政治斗争中一样,宪法扮演了一个非常重要的角色。批评积极干预的政府的人援引正当程序条款和保护自由权条款进行辩论,但收效甚微。对自由权的保护助成了“秘密权”的产生,这一权利又被用来维护人工流产权,但支持这一权利的优势相当微弱,一九○五年洛克乐诉纽约一条的判决曾宣布州立星期最高工时法
We are back to the old question, the fashionable topic one hundred years ago is the national authority problem. Today, we are unwittingly carrying on a debating that has aroused the attention of jurisprudence and political circles a century ago. The theme is still the question of the authority of the government. In this debate, just as in all the major political struggles in American politics, the Constitution plays a very important role. People who criticized the government that actively intervened cited the terms of due process and the terms of protection of liberty to debate but with little success. The protection of the right to freedom contributed to the creation of the “secret right,” which was again used to protect the artificial abortion rights. However, the advantage of supporting this right was rather weak. In 1905, Locke pleaded guilty to one New York sentence State Week of the highest working hours method