选入语文教材的大都是文质兼美的佳作。我们在教学中常常从正面加以讲解。但教学能否采用“欲擒故纵”的方法,对文章中某些重点难点提出质疑,甚至故意给予否定,然后再让学生“逆向思维”从正面加以肯定呢?我认为运用这种方法教学,可以启发学生站在作者的角度,研究作者的写作动机,及构思时的词法、句法和章法,然后站在作者的立场上与教者进行论辩,在与教者“唱反调”的过程中,加深对课文的理解,真正揣摩作者的写作动机,把握住作者构思过程中谋篇布局、遣词造句上的艺术匠心。这种方法不仅能使学生准确而深刻地把握课文,更能在“逆向思维”的过 Most of the selected Chinese language textbooks are excellent works of both character and beauty. We often explain from the front in teaching. But can the teaching use the method of “snapping in and out” and question some key difficulties in the article, even deliberately denying it, and then let the students “reverse thinking” positively affirmed? I think that using this method of teaching can be inspired From the author’s point of view, students study the author’s writing motives, as well as the lexical, syntactic, and syntactic principles of the author’s writing. Then he stood in the author’s position to argue with the teacher and deepen the text in the process of “singing a negative tone” with the teacher. The comprehension of the author’s writing intention is to really try to understand the writing motives of the author and grasp the artistic ingenuity in the author’s conceptual process. This method not only enables students to grasp the text accurately and profoundly, but also better