论文部分内容阅读
本文采用比较法与历史分析法的方法,指出造成违约责任的其中一个重要原因是由于合同法的许多制度受到旧法的影响,历史的惯性使得人们无视它存在的现实基础。随着现代各国合同义务的扩张,合同责任的基础已发生了很大变化,承认违约中的精神损害赔偿才能反映社会现实的变迁对法律的新诉求。此外,本文对反对违约责任中精神损害赔偿的意见进行了分析,从而对立法的完善提出相关建议。
This article uses the comparative method and the historical analysis method to point out that one of the important reasons for the responsibility for breach of contract is that many systems of the contract law are influenced by the old law and the inertia of history makes people ignore the realistic foundation of its existence. With the expansion of contractual obligations in various countries, the foundation of contractual liability has undergone great changes. It is only in recognition of the compensation for moral damages in the default that the new demands of law in the society can be reflected. In addition, this article analyzes the opinions of compensation for moral damage in the liability for breach of contract, and puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of legislation.