徐桂林所著《史通驳议》,虽长期以来一直被学界所忽视,但此书特色鲜明,在内容上专就刘知幾史学观点展开批判,在方法论上主要以《史通》前后篇章之抵牾加以评辨,并且能够摆脱儒家伦理名教观念束缚,不以爵位为标准裁量历史人物,在史体、史例论上创见颇多。虽然悖离了刘知幾的“实录”史学主旨,坚执“夷夏之辨”思想,寓褒贬于名号,但也是晚清西潮冲击语境下的时代反应,不足深咎。从研究方法与史料拓展两个方面而言,对《史通驳议》加以探析,将会对当前的《史通》研究有所裨益。 Though it has long been overlooked by the academic circles, Xu Guilin’s book “The Siton Opinion” has always been characterized by its distinctive characteristics. This book criticizes Liu Zhiji’s viewpoints of history historically. In methodology, The criticism and can get rid of the shackles of Confucian ethics and nobility, not to the title as a standard measure of historical figures, in the history, history theory on a lot of ideas. Although it departs from Liu Zhiji’s historical theory of “Record Record” and insists on the ideology of “resolving Yi-Xia”, it is praised and derogated from the name, but it is also a response to the times in the context of the impact of the Western tide in the late Qing dynasty. blame. From the aspects of research method and historical data expansion, the analysis of “Siton’s Dispute” will be beneficial to the current research of “Shi Tong”.