论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同血液净化方案治疗尿毒症的临床疗效。方法将我院48例尿毒症患者随机均分为血液滤过(HF)组和高通量血液透析(HFHD)组,比较两种透析方案的临床疗效。结果 HFHD组治疗总有效率显著高于HF组,β2-MG和血总胆固醇明显低于HF组(P<0.05)。结论两种血液净化方案均能有效改善尿毒症患者的临床症状,高通量血液透析疗效优于血液滤过。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effects of different blood purification programs on uremia. Methods 48 patients with uremia in our hospital were randomly divided into hemodialysis (HF) group and high-throughput hemodialysis (HFHD) group, comparing the clinical efficacy of the two dialysis regimens. Results The total effective rate of HFHD group was significantly higher than that of HF group, while β2-MG and total cholesterol were significantly lower than those of HF group (P <0.05). Conclusion Both methods of blood purification can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients with uremia, high-throughput hemodialysis is superior to hemofiltration.