论文部分内容阅读
本文取《箋三》《切二》作爲早期韻書的代表和《王三》進行又音比較。《王三》對前書又音的繼承非常忠誠。《王三》和《箋三》又音的吻合度非常高,兩書一脈相傳的説法可以確信。《王三》和《切二》的又音吻合情况説明《王三》和《切二》的關係比與《箋三》的關係還要密切一些。《箋三》《切二》《王三》從母書中繼承了共同的又音記録,又彼此獨立增注又音,《王三》增注最多,三書增注的都不是時音。
This article takes the “three” “cut two” as the representative of the early rhyme and “king of three” for a more sound comparison. “King Sam” is very loyal to the succession of the first book. The coincidence of “Wang San” and “Annan III” sound is very high. The two books can be believed from one mankind to another. The coincidence between “Wang San” and “Er Shi” also shows that the relationship between “Wang San” and “Er Shi” is more closely related to “Jian San”. “The three” “cut two” “king three” from the mother book inherited a common sound recording, but also independent of each other by note and tone, “king three” by the most note, three annotations are not the tunes.