常某因不服法院判决到当地检察院民事行政检察科申诉,承办人审查后,认为原审判决并无不当,建议对该案不予立案,经科长审核、检察长批准,作出了不予立案决定。常某又到上级检察院申诉,上级院也作出了不立案决定。常某对两级检察机关的决定不服,越级上访,并数次举报郑某民事行政玩忽职守、违反审判监督程序乱作为,给郑某的名誉造成了损害。事实上,郑某的遭遇在基层检察机关经常发生,如何保障检察官名誉权问题由此浮现。 Changmou was dissatisfied with the court decision to the local Procuratorate Civil Administrative Procuratorate complaints, contractors review, that the trial verdict is not improper, it is recommended not to file the case, the chief of the approval, the prosecutor approved, made a decision not to file a case . Changmou went to higher procuratorate appeal, the higher court also made a decision not to file. Chang a pair of prosecutors at both levels refused to accept the decision, the more petitioners, and several reports of Zheng’s negligence of civil administration, in violation of the trial and supervision of the process as chaos, to Jeong’s reputation caused damage. In fact, the experience of Jeong often occurs at the grassroots procuratorial organs, how to protect the reputation of prosecutors emerge.