论文部分内容阅读
目的研究不同采血方法在血常规检验中的应用价值。方法选择2016年3月~2017年3月本院接收且需行血常规检验的患者130例,利用投掷子的方式,将130例患者随机分成两组:实验组中的65例患者应用静脉采血法,对照组中的65例患者应用末梢采血法。综合分析两组血常规检验的结果,并作比较。结果实验组抽血时的VAS评分为(2.11±0.63)分,和对照组的(1.95±0.57)分比较无显著差异,P>0.05。实验组的WBC、HCT、HB、RBC与PLT指标的检测值均明显低于对照组,组间差异显著(P<0.05)。结论利用不同的采血方法对患者进行血常规检验可获得不同的结果,但相比较于末梢采血法,静脉采血能显著提升患者血常规检验的准确性,值得临床借鉴。
Objective To study the value of different blood sampling methods in routine blood tests. Methods From March 2016 to March 2017, 130 patients who received routine blood tests in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups according to throwing-off method. Sixty-five patients in the experimental group received intravenous blood sampling Act, the control group of 65 patients using peripheral blood collection method. Comprehensive analysis of the results of two blood tests, and for comparison. Results The VAS score of blood in the experimental group was (2.11 ± 0.63) points, which was not significantly different from that of the control group (1.95 ± 0.57), P> 0.05. The values of WBC, HCT, HB, RBC and PLT in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Different blood sampling methods can be used to perform routine blood tests. However, compared with the peripheral blood sampling methods, venous blood sampling can significantly improve the accuracy of blood tests and is worthy of clinical reference.