论文部分内容阅读
为了保证人民法院公正、及时审理医疗纠纷案件,保障和便利当事人依法行使诉讼权利,最高人民法院于2001年12月2日公布并于2002年4月1日起施行的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《若干规定》)第四条第一款第八项对医疗纠纷的举证责任作了新的规定:“因医疗行为引起的侵权诉讼,由医疗机构就医疗行为与损害结果之间不存在因果关系及不存在医疗过错承担举证责任。”这一举证责任的新规定在医务界引起较大的震动,也引起社会各界的关注。我刊编辑部于2002年5月21日召开“医疗纠纷举证责任研讨会”,上海法学界、司法界、医务界等各方专业人士40余人出席会议。现将若干与会代表不同观点的研讨发言和文章汇编如下,以供研究参考。
In order to ensure that the people’s courts fairly and promptly handle cases of medical disputes and safeguard and facilitate the parties to exercise their litigation rights according to law, the Supreme People’s Court, on December 2, 2001 and effective on April 1, 2002, Article 4, Paragraph 1, Article 8 of the Provisions (hereinafter referred to as “Certain Provisions”) provides new provisions on the burden of proof for medical disputes: “Infringement lawsuits arising from medical acts are regulated by medical institutions in respect of the medical acts and the consequences There is no causal relationship between the absence of medical malpractice and bear the burden of proof. ”The new provisions of the burden of proof in the medical profession caused a great shock, but also aroused the concern of all sectors of society. On May 21, 2002, the editorial department of our magazine held the Seminar on Burden of Proof of Medical Disputes. More than 40 professionals from Shanghai jurisprudence, judiciary and medical circles attended the meeting. Now a number of participants representing different views of the seminar speeches and articles compiled below, for research reference.