杨匡汉坚决主张本土化——但不是保守的而是开放的 ,是将他者包容进来 ,在异与变的碰撞中把本土一些相对稳定的、具有历史连续性的观念重新解读 ,以形成当代表述形式并对全球化产生的“反冲击”。孟繁华认为传统的批评方法、基本概念、关键词语已被渐次废除 ,代之而起的是他者的概念群 ,构成了当代文艺学发展的两难处境 ,但经过整合与重建 ,必有新成果涌现出来。金惠敏认为“回到主体”的对话 ,其意义仅在于使对话在预设的原始主体的前提上成为可能 ,而绝不是说在对话中虽身经百战而毫发未损的自我确认。“如果全球化是一种进攻型的帝国主义 ,那么在狭隘民族主义意识中徘徊的则是防御型的帝国主义”。李王君平认为 ,“本土化”不如“本土性”确切 ,因为前者试图“化”一切而显出霸气而后者只是提醒别忘记本土特点因而显得平和一些。“全球化背景”对中国文学理论本土性问题意味着既要从Universal(世界的、普遍的 )角度 ,也要从Manifold(多样的 )或Varied -dimension(多维的 )角度 ,将中国文论的异质性问题考虑进去。王钦峰尝试从后现代主义角度解构“本土” ,认为“本土化”的号召力是以民族文化的过去为基础的 ,其情感成份多而理性成分少 ,它可能把国家或民族推到固步自封的老路上去。林衡勋认为 ,现当 Yang Kuang-han firmly advocated localization - but not conservative but open, inclusive of the other, reinterpreted some of the relatively stable and historical continuity of the native territory in the collision of differentness and transformation to form a contemporary statement Form and “anti-shock” to globalization. According to Meng Fanghua, the traditional methods of criticism, basic concepts and key words have been gradually abolished. Instead, the concept group of the other is formed, which constitutes the dilemma of the development of contemporary literature and art. However, after the integration and reconstruction, there must be new achievements Emerged. Kim Huimin’s point of view of “returning to the subject” is merely to make the dialogue possible on the premise of the preset primitive subject, and not to say that it is a veiled self-confirmation that has been experienced in the dialogue without any loss. “If globalization is an offensive imperialism, defensive imperialism is hovering in the narrow nationalist consciousness.” Lee Wong-kwan believes that “localization” is not as “native” as it is because the former tries to “turn everything” into an overbearing one, and the latter only reminds himself of forgetting the local characteristics and thus appears more peaceful. The “Globalization Background” implies that the issue of the indigenous nature of Chinese literary theory means that the issue of Chinese literary theory must be viewed both from Universal perspective and from Manifold or Varied-dimensional perspective. Heterogeneity issues are taken into account. Wang Qinfeng tried to deconstruct “native land” from the perspective of postmodernism. He held that the appeal of “localization” was based on the past of national culture. It had many emotional components but few rational components. It might push the country or nation onto a path of self-preservation Go up. Lin Heng Xun believes that now