一、引言行为人能为而不为法所期待的行为,即为不作为犯。不作为犯可以分为纯正不作为犯和不纯正不作为犯。其中,对于纯正不作为犯,刑法作了单独、具体的规定,只要符合刑法所规定的构成要件,即成立犯罪。因此,在纯正不作为犯中,并不会出现构成要件不明确的问题。与之相反,对于不纯正不作为犯,刑法未作单独、具体的规定,只是因为实现了某一犯罪的构成要件结果,出于法益保护的目的,具有处罚必要性,才被 I. INTRODUCTION A person who does not act as an offender may not behave in the expectation of the law. Inaction as guilty of crimes can be divided into pure nonfeasance and impure omission. Among them, the purely omission, the criminal law made a separate, specific provisions, as long as they meet the constitutional elements of the provisions of the criminal law, that is, the establishment of a crime. Therefore, there is no issue of unclear constitutional elements in purely omission. On the contrary, for impure omission, the criminal law does not make separate and specific provisions, only because of the realization of the elements of a crime as a result, for the purpose of protecting the interests of law, with the necessity of punishment before being