论文部分内容阅读
在宋明儒学研究中,理学与心学的关系及其评价,无疑是注意的焦点(或可以说是显题)之一。正如杜维明先生所指出的那样:“朱熹与陆象山的短暂而又紧张的冲突被思想家们认为是宋明理学发展中的最重要的里程碑之一。它也被认为是把宋代学问分为朱熹的理学和陆象山的心学的基础。即使我们认为这样的分类方案过于简单而又容易引起误解,我们也不能否认这个思想冲突所包含的问题都具有多方面的深远意义。因而详细考查这个争论的要点就成了研究中国哲学的学者们的一个普遍研究的课题。确实,‘朱陆异同’这个宋明理学最重要的课题之一实
In the study of Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties, the relationship between Neo-Confucianism and psychology and its evaluation are undoubtedly one of the focuses (or arguably the obvious ones) of attention. As Mr. Du Weiming pointed out: ”The brief and intense conflicts between Zhu Xi and Lu Xiangshan were considered by thinkers to be one of the most important milestones in the development of Neo-Confucianism, and it was also considered as dividing Zhuang’s scholarship into Zhu Xi Of the Neo-Confucianism and Lu Xiangshan’s psychology.We can not deny that the problems involved in this ideological conflict have far-reaching meanings, even if we think such classification scheme is too simple and easy to cause misunderstandings.Therefore, a detailed examination of this controversy Has become a topic of universal research for scholars studying Chinese philosophy indeed, indeed, one of the most important subjects of the Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties