这是一篇被《文摘旬刊》遴选的通讯。编辑慧眼选它,愚以为首先是可读。别看该文标题长且有些别扭,但它却有可读之要素:军校大学生和女司机有这样的亲情。什么样的亲情呢?读罢便知。评一篇作品,首先评的是“可读”,似乎这“评”也太“简陋”了点,谁写文章追求的不是可读?在报业竞争日益激烈的今天,不要说生活类报纸,就是常常板着脸孔的大报,也强调可读性。其实,强调是一回事, This is a newsletter selected by the Digest X Journal. Editors choose the eye, stupid thought is readable first. Do not look at this article title long and some awkward, but it is readable elements: cadets and female drivers have such a dear friend. What kind of affection? Evaluation of a work, the first comment is “readable”, it seems that “comment” is too “simple” point, who wrote the article is not readable? Today in the increasingly competitive newspaper, do not say life newspaper , Is a big newspaper often face, but also emphasizes readability. In fact, emphasize is one thing,