论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同剖宫产术式对再次剖宫产的影响。方法本院自2011年7月至2012年7月行剖宫产手术产妇174例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各87例,治疗组产妇给予新式剖宫产,对照组产妇给予常规剖宫产,观察两组产妇手术时间、开腹时间、术中出血量等,统计两组产妇粘连情况。结果治疗组产妇手术时间、开服时间和术中出血量均明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),而粘连情况明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新式剖宫产对产妇的再次破宫产影响较小,但是术中出血量多、手术时间长,实际应用中应根据具体情况进行选择。
Objective To investigate the effect of different caesarean section on cesarean section. Methods The hospital from July 2011 to July 2012 174 cases of cesarean section maternal surgery were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 87 cases in each group, the treatment group maternal new cesarean delivery, the control group maternal Conventional cesarean section, observation of maternal operation time, laparotomy time, intraoperative blood loss, statistics of the two groups of maternal adhesions. Results The maternal operation time, opening time and intraoperative blood loss in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.05), and the adhesion was significantly better than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The new cesarean section has little effect on the second uterine rupture of the maternal, but the intraoperative blood loss is large and the operation time is long. In practical application, it should be selected according to the specific conditions.