论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术在治疗妇科急腹症方面的临床效果,并且对临床治疗效果进行对比。方法:选择2010年7月至2013年7月在重庆市涪陵区妇幼保健院接受治疗的妇科急腹症患者进行调查分析,本次研究共选取患者70例,并将其分为两组,其中观察组34例,采用腹腔镜方式进行治疗;对照组36例,采用常规开腹手术进行治疗,对两组患者的治疗效果进行对比。结果:两组患者均顺利完成手术,并且均没有出现术后并发症。观察组在治疗时间、出血量、使用抗生素时间以及肛门排气时间方面的效果均明显高于对照组,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对于妇科急腹症的治疗来讲,采用腹腔镜进行治疗的效果明显优于采用传统开腹手术的治疗方式。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of gynecological acute abdomen and to compare the clinical effects. Methods: From July 2010 to July 2013 in Fuling District of Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital for treatment of gynecologic acute abdomen patients were analyzed and analyzed in this study, a total of 70 patients were selected and divided into two groups, of which The observation group of 34 cases, the use of laparoscopic treatment; control group of 36 cases, the use of conventional laparotomy for treatment, the two groups of patients were compared. Results: The two groups of patients successfully completed the operation, and no postoperative complications. The effect of observation group on treatment time, blood loss, antibiotic time and anal exhaust time were significantly higher than the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of gynecologic acute abdomen, the effect of laparoscopic treatment is obviously better than that of the traditional laparotomy.