论文部分内容阅读
本文原载于《南京大学学报》(哲学·人文·社会科学)1990年笫1期,对《中国的现代化需要新启蒙》(该学报1989年第3期)一文进行了分析和评论。《中国的现代化需要新启蒙》一文反复强调和大肆鼓吹“新启蒙”论。认为“五四运动的特色是启蒙”,但“五四前期的启蒙运动没有进行得很充分,出现了紧急的民族危机,因而立即转入救亡运动”。“五四之后,迫于形势,中国共产党不得不卷入‘时政’,因而启蒙难以为继,恰恰是缺点。”文章提出,“近代中国还没有完成根本的启蒙运动,每一次启蒙运动的进行总是不彻底的。”“马克思主义的传播没有解决马克思主义和中国实际相结合的问题”,“中国人对马克思主义的理解也是浅薄的”。因此,“中国的现代化正在召唤一次抓住根本、彻底进行的新的启蒙运动。”《中国的现代化需要新启蒙》一文提出的问题,涉及到对五四运动的性质和历史作用,对中国人民选择马克思主义、选择中国共产党的领导、选择社会主义的历史必然性等一系列重要问题的评价,涉及到对中国共产党和中国人民革命斗争真象的了解。在这些问题上,《中国的现代化需要新启蒙》一文散布了许多错误的观点和歪曲的言论。这些问题是关系到我们党的历史和我国人民革命斗争历史的根本问题,是关系到我们坚持四项基本原则的根本问题,需要用科学的态度、科学的方法、科学的论证加以阐明,需要对国内外一些论著中的错误观点,进行针锋相对的、有理有据的分析和批判。基于此,本刊特予转载,以期以引起读者的关注。
This article was originally published in Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences) in 1990, and analyzed and commented on the article “Neo-Enlightenment of China's Modernization” (The Journal, Issue 3, 1989). The article “Neo-Enlightenment of China's Modernization” repeatedly emphasized and hype of “new enlightenment.” They considered that “the May 4th Movement was characterized by enlightenment,” but “the Enlightenment in the early May Fourth period did not go far enough and an emergency national crisis emerged. As a result, it immediately shifted to the national salvation movement.” “After the May 4th Movement, under the circumstances, the Chinese Communist Party had to be involved in 'political affairs', so enlightenment unsustainable, it is precisely the shortcomings.” Article argues that “in modern China has not yet completed a fundamental Enlightenment, every Enlightenment Always incomplete. ”“ The dissemination of Marxism did not solve the problem of combining Marxism with the reality of China, ”and“ Chinese people's understanding of Marxism is superficial. ” Therefore, “China's modernization is calling for a new Enlightenment to grasp the fundamental and thorough conduct.” The questions raised in the article “China's Modernization Needs Enlightenment” concern the nature and historical role of the May Fourth Movement and the persecution of the Chinese people The evaluation of a series of important issues such as the choice of Marxism, the choice of the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the historical necessity of choosing socialism involves the understanding of the true image of the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese people in their revolutionary struggles. On these issues, the article “China's modernization needs new enlightenment” has spread many erroneous opinions and distorted remarks. These issues are the fundamental issues that concern the history of our party and the history of the people's revolutionary struggles in our country. They are the fundamental issues that concern our adherence to the four cardinal principles. They need to be clarified with scientific attitude, scientific methods, and scientific arguments. Some erroneous viewpoints in some domestic and foreign treaties carry out tit-for-tat analysis and criticism which is justified and justified. Based on this, especially to be reproduced, in order to arouse the reader's attention.