论文部分内容阅读
司马光《资治通鉴》是一部公认的史学典范著作,因其史料搜罗详尽、史实考证细致、错误较少而在中国史学史上有着崇高的地位。然而《资治通鉴》毕竟受到各种条件所限,所记史事不可能尽善尽美,存在一些错误并不奇怪。本文将现存的其他典籍,如《梁书》、《魏书》、《北齐书》、《周书》、《南史》、《北史》、《册府元龟》、《太平御览》等等记载,与《资治通鉴》梁纪部分进行比对,发现一些错误。归纳起来可分成四种类型:一是时间记载失误,二是求简删省而导致错误,三是摘编史料发生失误,四是在删并史料时出现失误。我们之所以提出这一问题,是企盼学者在引用《资治通鉴》史料时,有必要加以仔细比对,从而确保所引史料的准确性,防止以讹传讹。
Sima Guang “Zi Zhi Tong Jian” is a well-recognized historical book which has a high status in the history of Chinese historiography for its detailed collection of historical materials, meticulous research on historical facts, and few mistakes. However, “Zi Zhi Tong Jian” is subject to various conditions, after all, the history can not be recorded in the perfect, there are some errors is not surprising. In this paper, the existing other books such as Liang Shu, Wei Shu, Northern Qi Shu, Zhou Shu, Nan Shi, Bei Shi, Tuen Yuan Yuan Tu, Taiping Yu Lan, And so records, and “Mirror” Liang Ji part of the comparison and found some mistakes. To sum up can be divided into four types: First, time records errors, the second is to seek Jane cut the province and lead to errors, the third is the selection of historical data errors, the fourth is in the deletion of historical data and mistakes. The reason why we put forward this issue is that it is necessary for scholars to carefully compare the historical materials cited in the “Mirror of General Knowledge” so as to ensure the accuracy of the cited historical materials and prevent the incorrect assertion.