通过对梅兰芳京剧表演艺术,尤其是他在民国年间四次出国演出的国际性影响,论述对梅兰芳京剧表演体系形成的作用,例如1935年他访苏演出之际苏方召开的研讨会上,格涅辛率先提出“不仅具有开创性,而且具有学术价值与理论意义。进而粗略梳理了1960年之后几位戏剧专家把梅兰芳戏剧观、梅兰芳戏剧体系与苏联斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基、德国的布莱希特比较,因此引起争论。文中巧妙回避了对论争各方的评价,着重其对梅兰芳京剧表演体系认识的深入揭示。 By discussing the international influence of Mei Lanfang’s Beijing opera performance art, especially his four overseas performances during the Republic of China, this paper discusses the role played by Mei Lanfang’s opera performance system in Peking opera, such as the Soviet Union held in 1935 when he visited the Soviet Union At the meeting, Gniesshese first proposed ”not only groundbreaking, but also has academic value and theoretical significance.And then roughly sort out after 1960, several theater experts to Mei Lanfang drama, Mei Lanfang drama system and the Soviet Union Stanney Slavsky, Germany compared to Brecht, thus arousing controversy.The article cleverly avoided the evaluation of all parties to the debate, focusing on its understanding of Mei Lanfang Peking Opera performance system reveals in-depth.