20世纪文论史上,文学的政治性一直是聚讼纷纭的问题,而这个话题的焦点之一,就是文学形式有否政治性。在形式一结构主义将文学形式当成文学的本体所在的观点具有极大权威性和影响的时代,要证明文学的政治性,最重要的问题是要证明文学形式具有政治性,克服了它,其他的方面就比较容易解决。正因为这个问题的难度和重要性,所以,它也成为文学非政治论者抵制政治论诗学的最有力武器和最重要的堡垒。如果弗·杰姆逊关于一切历史的、社会的“归根到底都是政治的”判断是合适的,那么,从根本上讲,从人类社会历史视角切入对文学问题阐释的马克思主义文 In the history of 20th century literary theory, the political nature of literature has always been a matter of controversy. One of the focuses of this topic is whether the literary form is political. In an era when the structuralist-structuralist view of the literary form as literary noumenon is extremely authoritative and influential, to prove the political nature of literature, the most important issue is to prove that the literary form is political, overcomes it and other The area is easier to solve. Precisely because of the difficulty and importance of this issue, it has also become the most powerful weapon and the most important fortress for literary non-politicalists to resist political poetics. If, in the opinion of FJ Jameson, all judgments about history and society are political in the final analysis, then it is fundamentally possible to cut Marxism into interpreting literary issues from the perspective of human society