“纯”,是个美好的字眼。 人们喜欢追求“纯”的境界。但,世界充满了辩证法,“纯”又往往并非那么美好。假如万里晴空一丝儿云彩都没有,就未免过于单调;花园里一派红花,却没有绿叶扶持,亦是大煞风景。再如人吧,如果要求人纯洁而又纯洁,连小小的污点也不允,恐怕他就很难与周围的人相交相知。诸如此类,比比皆是。古人云“水至清则无鱼,人至察则无徒”,确为至理名言。所以,对“纯”不可绝对化、极端化,应辩证地去对待,据以处世为人。 就国家大事而论,我们曾在求“纯”上吃过不少亏。因我们的最终目标是消灭私有制,实现共产主义,于是,便脱离历史阶段,过于超前地认为“公”字越大越纯就越好,便视“私”字如洪水猛兽,在所有制方面曾十分狂热地推行“一大二公”,在人的思想建设方面也曾大张 “Pure” is a beautiful word. People like to pursue “pure” realm. However, the world is full of dialectics, and “pure” is often not so beautiful. If there is no trace of clouds in the skies, it will be too monotonous. There will be no grand leaves in the garden but no green leaves. Another example is that if people are required to be pure and pure, they will not allow even small stains, and I am afraid that he will have difficulty meeting people around him. And so on, abound. The ancients cloud “water to clear no fish, no one to observe”, indeed the wisdom of wisdom. Therefore, the “pure” can not be absolute, extreme, should be treated dialectically, so life as a man. In terms of national affairs, we have eaten a lot in the pursuit of “purity.” Since our ultimate goal is to eliminate the ownership of private ownership and bring about communism, we are out of historical stages. We are too advanced to think that the greater the “public” character, the more pure the better, and the “private” character as a monstrous beast. The implementation of “one or two” has great accomplishments in the building of people’s ideology