新历史主义以其反对传统的黑格尔主义历史观在文学批评中的表现,反对文学与非文学、主体和客体之间的划分,反对对文本终极意义的追寻等批评实践而走上历史舞台。它从不同的视角来观察文本意义的产生过程及效果,解构传统的文本意义观念,进而发表自己的批评指向。新历史主义的内部难得有统一的理论标准,它重实践而轻理论建树,批评的立足点也不同,故而有“一个没 Neo-historicism embarked on the stage of history with its criticism of the performance of the historical view of the traditional Hegelianism in literary criticism, the opposition between literature and non-literature, the division between the subject and the object, and the pursuit of the ultimate meaning of the text . It observes the process and effect of textual meaning from different perspectives, deconstructs the traditional concept of textual meaning and then publishes its own criticism. The interior of New Historicism has a rare standard of theory. It emphasizes practice and light theory, and its standpoint of criticism is also different. Therefore, there is ”no one