论文部分内容阅读
国际班轮公会及运价组织联合非公会船东决定于2002年1月对中国货主强行收取THC,并认为收取THC是国际惯例,中国入世后在收取THC上应与国际接轨。该争议涉及班轮公会的性质、航运业的反垄断豁免及限制、班轮条款的适用等法律问题。THC之争也使中国入世后反垄断立法的完善、政府职能的转变及行业协会作用的发挥等问题凸现。
The International Liner Association and the FMCO Unconsolidated Owners decided to impose a mandatory THC on Chinese cargo owners in January 2002 and considered it an international practice to charge THC. After China’s accession to the WTO, THC should receive international standards. The dispute concerns the nature of liner conventions, antitrust exemptions and restrictions in the shipping industry and the application of liner provisions. THC controversy also makes China’s accession to the WTO after the completion of the improvement of antitrust legislation, the transformation of government functions and the role played by industry associations and other issues highlights.