《诗·新台》之“鸿”不是蟾蜍(蝦蟆),李思乐同志和马承玉同志得出了同样的结论.从而否定了半个世纪以来已成定案的闻说,厥功甚钜.对于闻说,笔者窃疑其非者有年,如今拜读两位先生宏论,所疑豁然,欣快无似!然而细读两文,终觉意犹未尽,论述过程中亦不无可商之处.故聊为补正如下. “Hong” of “Poetry New Taiwan” is not a toad (frog), and Comrade Li Sile and Ma Chengyu reached the same conclusion, thereby negating the already-confirmed news of the past half century that a great effort has been made. , I suspect that there are years of non-person, now read two gentlemen’s macro theory, the suspicion of the sudden, euphoric! However, reading the two texts, and ultimately feel unfinished, the discussion process is not without business place. Correction is as follows.