在小学语文教材中,有两首古诗词出现“疑”字。如: 飞流直下三千尺,疑是银河落九天。 (《望庐山瀑布》) 床前明月光,疑是地上霜。(《静夜思》) 许多老师在教学中自然而然地把这两首古诗的“疑”,解释为“怀疑”,教学参考书也持这种观点。笔者认为这种解释欠妥。道理很简单:诗人先肯定了某种事物,就不应再怀疑它是别的事物。如①②两例,既然上句说明遥看瀑布,飞流直下,为什么还要怀 In primary school Chinese teaching materials, two ancient poems appear “doubtful”. Such as: flying down three thousand feet, suspected Galaxy nine days. (“Hope Lushan Waterfall”) moonlight bed, suspected ground frost. Many teachers in teaching naturally interpret the “doubt” of these two ancient poems as “suspicion,” and the teaching reference books also hold this view. I think this explanation is not proper. The reason is simple: the poet first affirmed something, you should no longer doubt it is something else. Such as ① ② two cases, since the sentence on the remote view waterfall, flying down, why should pregnant