论文部分内容阅读
[案情]2008年,煤业公司职工郭某因一期尘肺被认定为工伤。同年9月,郭某与煤业公司解除劳动关系。10月,郭某又回到煤业公司工作。2014年2月,郭某被诊断为煤工尘肺贰期,以此为由递交材料提出工伤认定申请。某区人社局查阅档案核实材料后,认为郭某患一期尘肺已被认定为工伤,煤工尘肺贰期属伤残情况发生变化,故作出工伤认定申请不予受理决定书。郭某不服该决定书,遂提起行政诉讼。[分歧]一种观点认为,对工伤认定申请是否受理可采用实质审查标准,因区人社局查阅相关材料后已认定郭某尘肺贰期仅
[Case] In 2008, the coal company workers Kwak because of a pneumoconiosis was identified as work-related injuries. In September the same year, Kwak and the coal company to lift the labor relationship. In October, Kwak returned to the coal company. In February 2014, Mr. Kwak was diagnosed as Phase II of Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis and submitted applications for identification of work-related injuries on the basis of this. People's and Social Welfare Bureau, a district inspection archives verification of the material, that Kwak had a pneumoconiosis has been identified as work-related injuries, coal workers Pneumoconiosis II is a change in the situation of disability, it made a work-related injuries that the application will not be accepted decisions. Kwak refused to accept the decision, then filed an administrative lawsuit. [Disagreement] A view that the admissibility of work-related injury claims can be accepted by the substantive review of standards, because the District People's Social Security Bureau access to relevant materials have been identified Guo a pneumoconiosis II only