论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨延长聚焦超声技术的作用时间或改变聚焦超声技术的操作手法治疗重度宫颈糜烂的有效性和安全性。方法:将符合治疗条件的280例重度宫颈糜烂患者随机分为3组,观察组Ⅰ100例,观察组Ⅱ100例,对照组80例,对3组患者治疗效果和术后不良反应进行观察和对比。结果:观察组Ⅰ的有效率为98.00%,观察组Ⅱ的有效率为99.00%,对照组的有效率为76.25%,观察组Ⅰ、Ⅱ治疗效果明显高于对照组(P<0.05),不良反应基本相同(P>0.05)。结论:即延长聚焦超声技术作用时间或改变聚焦超声技术操作手法有利于临床治疗。
Objective: To explore the effect of prolonging the action time of focused ultrasound technique or changing the operating technique of focused ultrasound technique in the treatment of severe cervical erosion. Methods: Two hundred and seventy patients with severe cervical erosion were randomly divided into three groups. The observation group included 100 cases in observation group, 100 cases in observation group and 80 cases in control group. The therapeutic effects and postoperative adverse reactions were observed and compared in three groups. Results: The effective rate of observation group Ⅰ was 98.00%, the effective rate of observation group Ⅱ was 99.00%, the effective rate of control group was 76.25%. The treatment effect of observation group Ⅰ and Ⅱ was significantly higher than that of the control group (P0.05) The reaction was basically the same (P> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging the duration of focused ultrasound or changing the technique of focused ultrasound is beneficial to clinical management.