论文部分内容阅读
继格鲁吉亚的“玫瑰革命”、乌克兰的“橙色革命”之后,吉尔吉斯斯坦又发生了“黄色革命”。虽然由于国情、方式、起因、结果等方方面面的不同,吉尔吉斯斯坦的“黄色革命”与上述两国有明显的区别,但吉国的变动却很有可能引起连锁反应,特别是将影响石油资源丰富的哈萨克斯坦,使中亚政治进程进入继前苏联解体之后的又一个多事之秋。一、西方铺就的“革命”道路吉尔吉斯国会选举原来相对平静,当局专门设计了“透明投票箱”和“拇指印刻”,被认为是创意之举。结果是反对派大败,在众多国家的观察员中,仅有西方选举观察员鉴定当地的安全措施“限制选民自由”。这就是吉国事变的理论基础。
After the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia and the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan has again experienced a “Yellow Revolution.” Although the “Yellow Revolution” in Kyrgyzstan differs significantly from the above two countries due to differences in national conditions, methods, causes, and outcomes, the changes in Kyrgyzstan are likely to cause a chain reaction, especially affecting the oil-rich Kazakh. Stein made the political process in Central Asia enter another trouble-making period after the disintegration of the former Soviet Union. I. The “Road of Revolution” laid by the West The Kyrgyz parliament vote was originally relatively calm. The authorities specially designed the “transparent ballot box” and the “thumbprint” to be considered creative. As a result, the opposition has lost ground. Among the observers of many countries, only Western election observers have identified local security measures as “limiting the freedom of voters”. This is the theoretical basis of the Kyrgyz State Incident.