论文部分内容阅读
顾裕岳、姜平二同志在1991年第6期《理论与改革》刊物上发表的《领导科学逻辑起点新探》(以下简称《新探》),是值得商榷的。《初探》的作者(下面简称作者)用大量的引经据典证明自己提出的“决策”是领导科学的逻辑起点的正确性。笔者认为,作者的探索精神是可佳的。有的意见是值得肯定的,但是,也有偏颇之处。笔者就此谈点个人学习和研究的体会与作者切磋,并求教于学界同仁和广大读者。
Gu Yueyue and Jiang Pingli’s “New Probe into the Starting Point of Logical Science Logic” (hereinafter referred to as “the New Exploration”) published by the “Theory and Reform” No. 6 Journal in 1991 is debatable. The author of “Preliminary Exploration” (hereinafter referred to as the author) proves that the “decision” he has put forward with a large number of quoted documents is the correct logical starting point for leading science. The author believes that the author’s exploration spirit is good. Some opinions are worthy of recognition, but there are also biases. I talk about personal learning and research experience and learn from the author, and neighborhoods in the academic colleagues and readers.