论文部分内容阅读
近读《竞争力》署名文名作者的撰文“IT业：CEO薪酬与业绩无关”,笔者对文中数据予以“伤感关注”,在2004财年全球IT行业薪酬排行中,甲骨文的拉里·埃利森以2131．9万美元雄居榜首,苹果电脑公司的史蒂夫·乔布斯以0美元排名最后,2005财年Verisign公司的CEO斯特拉顿·斯科拉沃思的竞争系数以163％直夺新冠。我们研究分析发现,这些CEO的业绩与公司净销售额的相关度只有11％,而CEO的薪酬却呈现逐年看涨的趋势,因为在许多大股东看来,另请一个CEO比罢免一个要价更高。
Nearly read the author of “Competitiveness”: “IT industry: CEO pay and performance has nothing to do”, the author of the text data to be “sad concern” in the 2004 global IT industry pay rankings, Oracle’s Larry E Leeson topped the list with 21.319 million U.S. dollars and Steve Jobs at Apple Computer ranked first with 0 U.S. dollars. In Fiscal 2005, Verisign’s CEO, Stratton-Scolaworth, had a competitive coefficient of 163% Direct new crown. Our research and analysis found that the performance of these CEOs is only 11% of the company’s net sales, while the CEO’s salary is showing a year-on-year positive trend because in the opinion of many large shareholders, another CEO is asked to take a higher price than removing an asking price .