论文部分内容阅读
AIM: To compare the liver stiffness (LS) measurement by transient elastography (TE) to the liver biopsy (LB)-considered the “gold standard” in the evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: During a period of 12 mo, we evaluated 199 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV), in which LB and LS assessments (by means of TE) were performed during the same session. RESULTS: Out of 199 patients, a valid measurement of the LS could not be obtained in 8. The mean value of LS in the cohort of 191 valid measurements was 8.45 ± 4.96 kPa, ranging from 2.3 to 38 kPa. The mean value of LS in patients with signifi cant fi brosis at biopsy (161 patients with F ≥ 2 according to Metavir) was 9.02 ± 5.15 kPa, significantly higher than in patients with no or mild fi brosis (30 patients with F < 2 Metavir): 5.39 ± 1.81 kPa (P < 0.0001). For a cut- off value of 6.8 kPa, the LS had a PPV of 98%, a NPV of 30.1%, a sensitivity of 59.6% and a specificity of 93.3% for the presence of signifi cant fi brosis (at least F2 Metavir), with a diagnostic performance of 77.3% (AUROC 0.773). Using this cut-off value, we reached the best discrimination between absence of fibrosis/ mild fibrosis (F < 2 Metavir) and the presence ofmoderate to severe fi brosis (F ≥ 2 Metavir). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic hepatitis due to HCV, a cut-off value of 6.8 kPa measured by TE can differentiate between significant fibrosis and absent or mild fi brosis, with a PPV of 98%, a NPV of 30.1%, a sensitivity of 59.6%, a specificity of 93.3%, and a diagnostic performance of 77.3%.
AIM: To compare the liver stiffness (LS) measurement by transient elastography (TE) to the liver biopsy (LB) -considered the “gold standard ” in the evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: During a period of 12 mo, we evaluated 199 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV), which LB and LS assessments (by means of TE) were performed during the same session. RESULTS: Out of 199 patients, a valid measurement of the LS could not be obtained in 8. The mean value of LS in the cohort of 191 valid measurements was 8.45 ± 4.96 kPa, ranging from 2.3 to 38 kPa. The mean value of LS in patients with signifi cant fi brosis at biopsy (161 patients with F ≥ 2 according to Metavir) was 9.02 ± 5.15 kPa, significantly higher than in patients with no or mild fi brosis (30 patients with F <2 Metavir): 5.39 ± 1.81 kPa (P <0.0001) value of 6.8 kPa, the LS had a PPV of 98%, a NPV of 30.1%, a sensitivity of 59.6% and a specificity o f 93.3% for the presence of signifi cant fi brosis (at least F2 Metavir), with a diagnostic performance of 77.3% (AUROC 0.773). Using this cut-off value, we reached the best discrimination between absence of fibrosis / mild fibrosis CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic hepatitis due to HCV, a cut-off value of 6.8 kPa measured by TE can differentiate between significant fibrosis and absent or mild fi brosis, with a PPV of 98%, a NPV of 30.1%, a sensitivity of 59.6%, a specificity of 93.3%, and a diagnostic performance of 77.3%.