论文部分内容阅读
目的对WHO总部、WHO非洲区办公室、中国CDC、美国CDC、欧盟CDC的卫生应急作业中心进行对比分析。找出它们的相同及不同之处,为我国卫生部门应急指挥中心建设及改进提供借鉴。方法采用跨国比较分析方法,根据WHO召开的EOC Net会议提供的资料以及相关文献资料,对WHO总部、WHO非洲区办公室、中国CDC、美国CDC、欧盟CDC的卫生应急作业中心从硬件条件、主要功能和管理等方面进行比较,找出可供我国借鉴之处。结果各个机构的应急作业中心在硬件及功能等方面有一定相似之处,但与国外先进机构相比,中国CDC的应急作业中心在其建筑规模、日常功能、信息系统管理、分级响应等方面仍有一定提升的空间。结论我国将来在卫生应急作业中心建设方面应加强硬件建设,充分利用应急作业中心的条件开展日常工作和应急响应工作,建立应急作业管理信息系统,建立分级响应制度。
Objective To compare and analyze the health emergency center of WHO headquarters, WHO Africa Office, China CDC, USA CDC and EU CDC. Find out the similarities and differences between them and provide reference for the construction and improvement of emergency command center in China’s health department. Methods Based on the information provided by the WHO EOC Net conference and relevant documents, the cross-country comparative analysis method was used to analyze the health emergency operations center of WHO headquarters, WHO Africa Office, China CDC, US CDC and EU CDC from the aspects of hardware conditions, main functions And management and other aspects to find out for reference for our country. As a result, there are some similarities in terms of hardware and functions among the emergency operation centers of various agencies. However, compared with the advanced institutions in other countries, the CDC emergency operations center in China still has many problems in terms of its construction scale, daily functions, information system management and grading response There is some room for improvement. Conclusion In the future, our country should strengthen hardware construction in the construction of health emergency center, make full use of the conditions of emergency center to carry out routine work and emergency response work, set up emergency operation management information system and establish a hierarchical response system.