论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析临床路径在小儿肺炎中的应用效果。方法:收集我院2012年8月-2013年8月期间诊治的小儿肺炎患者100例作为研究对象,采用随机分组的方式将患者分为观察组与对照组,每组患者各50例。对照组采用常规护理模式,观察组在对照组的基础上实施临床护理路径,对两组患者的临床效果进行分析对比。结果:研究结果显示,观察组中治愈率为100.0%,有2名患者发生并发症,并发症发生率为4.0%;对照组患者的治愈率为100.0%,有10名患者发生并发症,并发症发生率为20.0%,两组患者的治愈率比较无明显差异,但观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者平均康复时间为(8.8±1.7)d,对照组患者平均康复时间为(11.2±1.8)d,观察组患者的平均康复时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:临床路径在小儿肺炎中具有良好的应用效果,能有效降低并发症发生率,缩短患者的康复时间,值得在临床应用上推广。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect in children with pneumonia. Methods: 100 cases of pediatric pneumonia diagnosed and treated in our hospital from August 2012 to August 2013 were collected. Patients were divided into observation group and control group by random grouping, with 50 cases in each group. The control group used routine nursing mode, and the observation group carried out the clinical nursing pathway on the basis of the control group. The clinical effects of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The results showed that the cure rate in the observation group was 100.0%. Complications occurred in 2 patients and the complication rate was 4.0%. In the control group, the cure rate was 100.0%. Complications occurred in 10 patients, and complications The incidence of the disease was 20.0%. There was no significant difference in the cure rate between the two groups, but the complication rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). The mean recovery time in the observation group was (8.8 ± 1.7) days, The mean recovery time of the control group was (11.2 ± 1.8) days, and the average recovery time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical pathway has a good application effect in children with pneumonia, which can effectively reduce the incidence of complications and shorten the recovery time of patients, which is worth popularizing in clinical application.