表面上观察苏州的发展战略和杭州的发展战略,对增加政府财政收入、改善政府提供公共物品和服务的能力及水平有异曲同工之妙,但就城市竞争力而言,苏州以技术为核心的需求导向型产业发展战略更具持久力,而杭州的资源主导型增长战略在新一轮的“成本洼地”竞争中有可能失去优势 Superficially observing the development strategy of Suzhou and Hangzhou’s development strategy have the same effect on increasing the government’s fiscal revenue and improving the government’s ability and level of providing public goods and services. However, in terms of urban competitiveness, the technology-centered demand in Suzhou Oriented industrial development strategy is more enduring, while Hangzhou’s resource-based growth strategy may lose its advantage in the new round of “cost depression” competition