论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 李某是一名矿工,因矿井发生事故而死亡。在后事处理中,矿主赔偿其十五万元,其中包括给李的儿子抚养费7万元。李的母亲怕儿媳日后改嫁带走钱款,因此与儿媳达成协议:孙子由儿媳抚养,矿里发的抚养费署儿媳的名字存于指定银行,存折由婆婆保管。儿媳每月到婆婆处取存折去银行支取抚养费300元,支取后将存折仍交回婆婆保管。如遇特殊情况支取数额变化由双方商定。协议履行半年后,媳妇认为自己为儿子支取抚养费不应该受婆婆监管,于是向法院起诉,要求撤销此协议,请问他们的协议是否有效,该不该撤销?
Editor's Comrade: Lee is a miner who died as a result of a mine accident. In the post-processing, the mine owner paid 150,000 yuan, including 70,000 yuan for Li's son's maintenance. Lee's mother was afraid that her daughter-in-law would be able to remarry and take away the money in the future, thus reaching an agreement with the daughter-in-law: the grandson was raised by her daughter-in-law and the name of the daughter-in-law in the mine was deposited with the designated bank and the passbook was kept by her mother-in-law. Daughter-in-law to go to the mother-in-law at a deposit to the bank to withdraw support payments 300 yuan, after the withdrawal of the passbook is still returned to custody of her mother-in-law. In exceptional circumstances the amount of change agreed upon by both parties. After the agreement was fulfilled for six months, the wife-in-law thought she should not be subject to her custody for her son's support payments. She filed a lawsuit in court demanding that the agreement be withdrawn and whether the agreement was valid and should not be revoked.