论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨再次剖宫产时两种手术方式的利弊,提高剖宫产技术,减少并发症。方法对产科2005年1月至2007年12月疤痕子宫再次剖宫产144例分传统剖宫产组与新式剖宫产组,进行回顾性分析。结果传统剖宫产与新式剖宫产在手术时间、术后排气时间、术中粘连程度比较,差异显著;术中出血量比较差异无显著性。结论严格掌握剖宫产指征,降低剖宫产率,对有剖产指征者应依受术者选择最佳手术方式,以利于再次手术的操作,减少手术创伤。
Objective To explore the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods in the second cesarean section, to improve cesarean section technique and reduce the complications. Methods From January 2005 to December 2007, a total of 144 cases of cesarean section were divided into traditional cesarean section group and new cesarean section group respectively. The retrospective analysis was made. Results Traditional cesarean section and new cesarean section in operation time, postoperative exhaust time, intraoperative adhesions, the difference was significant; bleeding was no significant difference. Conclusion Strict control of cesarean section indications and reduce the rate of cesarean section, indications of incision should be selected by the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach to facilitate the operation of the re-operation to reduce surgical trauma.