论文部分内容阅读
布尔迪厄认为阶级与文化之间是相互强化的 ,吉尔茨认为文化是传承的 ,根据这个逻辑 ,两个敌对的阶级和文化是不可能和解的。布鲁克斯提供了一个反例 ,曾经敌对的布尔乔亚和波希米亚如今已经合流为融合了二者特征的布波族 ,并因此构成了对布尔迪厄和吉尔茨命题的挑战。对布、波的分析表明 ,阶级与文化之间相互强化以及文化传承的基础是阶级的社会经济特征 ,不同社会基础的阶级之间是无法进行文化与阶级的相互强化和文化传承的 ,布波族之所以融合了布尔乔亚和波希米亚的阶级和文化特征 ,是因为它与后二者之间有着完全不同的社会基础 ,自然也就没有继承二者之间的敌对
Bourdieu believes that class and culture reinforce each other, and Girtz believes that culture is inherited. According to this logic, it is impossible for the two hostile classes and cultures to reconcile. Brooks provided a counterexample, and the once hostile Bourgeois and Bohemia now have merged into the Butu tribe that characterizes both and thus pose a challenge to the Bourdieu and Gilts propositions. The analysis of cloth and wave shows that the basis for the mutual reinforcement of class and culture and the inheritance of culture is the social and economic characteristics of the class. It is impossible for the classes of different social backgrounds to reinforce each other and to inherit culture and class. The reason why the clan combines the class and cultural features of Bourgeois and Bohemia is because it has a completely different social basis with the latter two and naturally does not inherit the hostility between the two