论文部分内容阅读
一九二七年“四·一二”蒋介石叛变后,武汉国民政府决定继续出师北伐。长期以来,学术界认为这是一个正确的战略决策。一九八一年《周恩来选集》上卷出版后,不少论者根据《迅速出师讨伐蒋介石》一文,否定了继续北伐的正确性,认为只有东征讨蒋才是正确的战略决策,才是“挽救第一次国内革命战争失败的最有效的办法”。这样,对一九二七年党内曾经出现的北上与东下之争,就有重新讨论的必要了。我们认为,无论东征还是北伐,都很难说是正确的决策,都不可能挽救第一次国内革命战争的失败。
After the rebellion of Chiang Kai-shek on “April 12” in 1927, the Wuhan National Government decided to proceed with the Northern Expedition. For a long time, academics think this is a correct strategic decision. After the publication of the “Selected Works of Zhou Enlai” in 1981, many writers denied the correctness of continuing the Northern Expedition based on the article “Quickly Defending Chiang Kai-shek,” and held that it is only the right strategic decision to seek Chiang Kai-shek's “ The most effective way to save the failure of the first domestic revolutionary war. ” In this way, there is a need for a new discussion of the dispute between the north and the east that occurred in the party in 1927. In our opinion, it is hard to say that it is the right decision both in the eastward and in the northern expeditions to save the failure of the first domestic revolutionary war.