加强对干部特别是领导干部的监督工作,是坚持从严治党,从源头上遏制腐败现象,保持干部队伍纯洁性的一个重要手段。在长期的工作实践中,我们党创造和积累了许多加强干部监督的有效措施。这次在县以上领导班子和领导干部中开展的“三讲”教育,是我们党在新的历史条件下解决好自身问题的又一次创造性探索,为加强党的建设特别是推进干部监督工作提供了很多新鲜经验。“三讲”教育的成果,不仅体现在较好地解决了领导班子和领导干部党性党风方面存在的突出问题,而且也为我们从制度上、机制上更好地健全和完善干部监督工作开辟了新思路、提供了新方法。一、将阶段性的“开门三讲”转变为长期性的“开门监督”。自觉接受群众监督,是我们党的建设的一条宝贵经验。前些年,我们也一直强调干部要自觉接受群众监督,但那种监督往往是被动的,群众的意见大多是通过信访、举报等途径反映上来。由于渠道较窄,群众的监督作用很难有效发挥出来。这次的“开门三讲”,通过召开座谈会、发放征求意见表、设立意见箱、开设专线电话、民主评议、民主测评等多种方式,广开言路,使很多群众过去不敢说、不愿说、不好说、没有机会说的话都说出来了。许多群众反映,过去整风都是“领导有病、群众吃药”,这次开门搞“三 To strengthen the supervision over cadres, especially leading cadres, is an important means of insisting on strictly administering the party and curbing corruption at the source so as to maintain the purity of the ranks of cadres. In our long-term working practices, our party has created and accumulated many effective measures to strengthen the supervision of cadres. This “three stresses” education conducted among the leading bodies and leading cadres at and above the county level is yet another creative exploration made by our party to solve its own problems under the new historical conditions and provides it with the task of strengthening party building, especially promoting cadre supervision. A lot of fresh experience. The achievements of the “three stresses” education are not only reflected in the outstanding problems in the work of leading bodies and leading cadres in their party-style and party work, but also in providing us with a better system and mechanism for opening up and improving the supervision of cadres The new ideas, provides a new way. First, the phased “three open door” into a long-term “open door supervision.” Consciously accepting supervision by the masses is a valuable experience in the construction of our party. In previous years, we also emphasized that cadres should consciously accept the supervision of the masses. However, such supervision is often passive. Most people’s opinions are reflected through petitions, reports and other channels. Due to the narrower channels, it is very difficult for the masses to effectively supervise them. This “open the door to the three stresses” made it possible for many masses to dare not say in the past by holding forums, issuing soliciting opinions, setting up suggestion boxes, setting up hotlines, conducting democratic appraisals, and conducting democratic assessments. I’m sorry to say that there is no chance to speak out. Many people have said that in the past rectification was “leading disease and taking medicine by the masses.” This time,