论文部分内容阅读
1.当前在设计和研究工作中存在一些距离。对一些复杂问题,特别土力学的问题,研究工作很细,但是难于在各种情况的工程设计中广泛应用。原文《论设计中的比较方法》即是为此目的,用此方法所得是相对安全度,而非绝对安全度,可以帮助设计工作者作出决策。2.式(15)、(16)对N的解释,见原稿文献[2]、[3]似较明显,这里不再说明。《讨论》第2条对震级和烈度的讨论是正确的,但是原参考文献中也未说明与震中距离等复杂关系,“比较方法”仅是借用试验结果和安全度的相对关系,利用这些公式说明围压、孔隙度、贯入度等相对关系无疑对设计是有价值的。
1. There is currently some distance in design and research work. For some complex problems, especially the problems of soil mechanics, the research work is very detailed, but it is difficult to be widely used in engineering design in various situations. The original “Comparative Approach to Design” is for this purpose. Using this method, the relative safety, rather than absolute safety, can help design workers make decisions. 2. For the interpretation of N in (15) and (16), see the original documents [2] and [3] which seem to be more obvious and will not be described here. The discussion of magnitude and intensity in Article 2 of the “Discussion” is correct, but the original reference also did not explain the complex relationship with the epicentral distance, and the “comparative method” only borrowed the relative relationship between test results and safety, and used these formulae. It is clear that relative relationships such as confining pressure, porosity and penetration are undoubtedly valuable for design.