【裁判要旨】认定提供信息存储空间的网络服务提供者是否应当承担教唆的侵权责任时,应根据信息网络传播权条例第二十二条有关规定,确定其是否可以免责。网络服务提供者的侵权责任属于过错责任,具体体现为对于网络用户侵权行为的明知或应知。而网络服务提供者从侵权作品中直接获得经济利益的,应承担较高的注意义务,其构成应知的可能性相对增加。 【Referee Key Points】 If the network service provider that provides information storage space should bear the tort liability of abetting, it should be determined whether it can be exempted from the liability according to the relevant provisions of Article 22 of the Regulations on the Right of Information Network Dissemination. The tort liability of ISPs belongs to the fault liability, which is specifically manifested as knowing or should know about the infringement of network users. However, if the network service provider directly obtains economic benefits from the infringing works, it should assume a high degree of duty of care and its composition should be relatively more likely to be known.